<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Food for Thought &#8211; Social Networking and Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dishingdesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/20/food-for-thought-social-networking-and-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dishingdesign.com/blog/2009/11/20/food-for-thought-social-networking-and-privacy/</link>
	<description>A fresh twist on learning development!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jillian</title>
		<link>http://dishingdesign.com/blog/2009/11/20/food-for-thought-social-networking-and-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dishingdesign.com/blog/?p=342#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ve definitely brought up an interesting point and I can see it from both sides.  If I was an employer and had the ability to do a bit of investigation about a potential employee, it would be hard to resist.  The information is all there - what the person&#039;s interests are, how they present themselves to the public, their motivations (or lack of), their thoughts - so, why not?  I think that people who use social networking sites (myself included) have a difficult time separating their work selves from their social selves.  We all have different versions of ourselves that we reveal and hide when the situation calls for it - the tact involved is choosing when to do so.  Speaking from personal experience, I have my Facebook set to private and it can only be viewed in its entirety by those I know and trust - my friends and family.  If I were going to present a public profile, one that may be viewed by a prospective employer - I&#039;d make sure that the Jillian I was representing would be more formal, more refined and professional.  If you don&#039;t control the content you post and assume that people will have to take you as you always are, you&#039;re then subject to criticism for, say, having a glass of wine.  This all boils down to being smart about how you use the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ve definitely brought up an interesting point and I can see it from both sides.  If I was an employer and had the ability to do a bit of investigation about a potential employee, it would be hard to resist.  The information is all there &#8211; what the person&#8217;s interests are, how they present themselves to the public, their motivations (or lack of), their thoughts &#8211; so, why not?  I think that people who use social networking sites (myself included) have a difficult time separating their work selves from their social selves.  We all have different versions of ourselves that we reveal and hide when the situation calls for it &#8211; the tact involved is choosing when to do so.  Speaking from personal experience, I have my Facebook set to private and it can only be viewed in its entirety by those I know and trust &#8211; my friends and family.  If I were going to present a public profile, one that may be viewed by a prospective employer &#8211; I&#8217;d make sure that the Jillian I was representing would be more formal, more refined and professional.  If you don&#8217;t control the content you post and assume that people will have to take you as you always are, you&#8217;re then subject to criticism for, say, having a glass of wine.  This all boils down to being smart about how you use the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.277 seconds -->
